Hudi vs. Iceberg: Choosing the Right Table Format for Your Data Lakehouse


Table of Contents

The rise of data lakehouses has brought a new set of challenges. How do you efficiently store, manage, and analyze massive amounts of data to allow for flexibility and future growth? Apache Hudi and Apache Iceberg are two open-source table formats vying for dominance in this space. Both offer solutions for data lakes and data lakehouses but with distinct strengths and weaknesses. This blog post will delve into the key differences between Hudi and Iceberg, helping you decide which format best suits your specific data needs.

Understanding Data Lakes and Data Lakehouses:

Before diving into Hudi and Iceberg, let’s establish a common ground. Traditional data lakes store vast amounts of raw, unstructured data in its native format. While valuable for data collection, analyzing this data can be cumbersome. Data lakehouses bridge the gap by introducing schema and transactional capabilities, allowing for structured data storage alongside the raw data. This enables efficient querying and analysis while retaining the flexibility of a data lake.

ACID Transactions and Schema Evolution: Common Ground

Both Hudi and Iceberg offer some level of ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) guarantees, ensuring data integrity during updates. This is crucial for maintaining trust in your data analysis. Additionally, both support schema evolution, allowing you to modify your data structure over time without impacting existing data or queries. This adaptability is essential in today’s ever-changing data landscape.

Hudi: A Data Lake Platform with Real-Time Ingestion

Hudi goes beyond a simple table format. It aspires to be a comprehensive data lake platform offering features for data ingestion, updates, deletes, and even real-time data access. Think of it as a database layer built on top of your data lake storage. This functionality makes Hudi ideal for scenarios requiring frequent data updates and real-time analytics.

Key Strengths of Hudi:

  • Real-time Data Ingestion: Hudi excels at ingesting data streams with features like upserts (updating existing records) and deletes.
  • Data Lake Platform: Hudi offers a broader feature set beyond storage, including data cleansing, deduplication, and compaction functionalities.
  • ACID Compliance (Read Committed): Hudi provides read-committed ACID guarantees, ensuring data consistency when multiple readers access the data concurrently.

Potential Drawbacks of Hudi:

  • Complexity: Hudi’s feature-rich nature can lead to a more complex setup and management compared to Iceberg.
  • Performance Overhead: The additional features might introduce some performance overhead compared to Iceberg’s focus on efficient storage and retrieval.
  • Integration Maturity: While Hudi enjoys broader integration with data processing frameworks like Spark and Flink, Iceberg’s integrations are catching up.

Iceberg: Simplicity and Efficient Data Storage

Iceberg takes a more streamlined approach, focusing primarily on efficient data storage, retrieval, and schema management. It excels at organizing and querying large datasets, making it ideal for data warehousing and historical analysis.

Key Strengths of Iceberg:

  • Simplicity: Iceberg boasts a simpler design, making it easier to set up and manage compared to Hudi.
  • Efficient Storage: Iceberg prioritizes efficient data storage and retrieval, potentially leading to better performance for certain workloads.
  • Growing Ecosystem: While integrations might be fewer currently, Iceberg’s ecosystem is gaining traction with broader support across various tools.

Potential Drawbacks of Iceberg:

  • Limited Ingestion Capabilities: Iceberg currently only supports appending new data. Updates and deletes require workarounds through integrations with other tools.
  • ACID Compliance (Eventual Consistency): Iceberg offers eventual consistency, meaning updates might not be immediately reflected across all readers.

Choosing Between Hudi and Iceberg: A Matter of Needs

The best choice between Hudi and Iceberg depends on your specific data requirements:

  • Choose Hudi if:
    • You require frequent data updates and real-time analytics capabilities.
    • Your use case demands a comprehensive data lake platform with functionalities beyond just storage.
    • You have the resources and expertise to manage a potentially more complex setup.
  • Choose Iceberg if:
    • You prioritize simplicity and efficient data storage and retrieval for historical analysis.
    • Your data ingestion process primarily involves adding new data (with potential workarounds for updates/deletes).
    • You value a growing ecosystem with simpler integrations, even if it might be less mature than Hudi’s currently.


Both Hudi and Iceberg are valuable tools for building data lakehouses. Hudi empowers real-time data management with its platform-like features, while Iceberg offers streamlined data storage and querying. By understanding their strengths and weaknesses, you can make

FocusData Lake PlatformTable Format for Data Storage and Retrieval
Real-Time IngestionYes (Upserts, Deletes)No (Append Only, Workarounds for Updates/Deletes)
Schema EvolutionYesYes
ACID ComplianceRead CommittedEventual Consistency
ComplexityMore ComplexSimpler
PerformancePotentially Lower Overhead for Storage/RetrievalPotentially Higher Overhead for Feature Set
IntegrationsBroader (Spark, Flink)Growing Ecosystem (catching up)
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scroll to Top